4.7 Article

Sustainable design performance evaluation with applications in the automobile industry: Focusing on inefficiency by undesirable factors

Journal

OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 553-558

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2012.07.002

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA); Efficiency; Undesirable factors; Sustainable design; Environment

Funding

  1. NSC [98-2410-H-019-006-MY2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Design for the environment (DIE) has been recognized as one of the most important practices for achieving sustainability. One major challenge in DIE implementation is how to effectively deal with the mix of the both the desirable outputs (to maintain or improve traditional product attributes) and the undesirable outputs (to reduce environmental impacts) in the design process. In this paper, we develop a new Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model for DIE performance evaluation where the simultaneous increase of desirable outputs and decrease of undesirable outputs are considered with a focus on identifying inefficiency as a result of higher levels of undesirable performance. We show that our proposed method is capable of establishing a benchmark with lower undesirable outputs for an inefficient decision making unit (DMU) than other models in the existing literature. We also use empirical data to demonstrate the applications of our DEA model in evaluating the sustainable design performances of different vehicle designs for the automobile industry. By treating the undesirable factors as the dominating factors in evaluating a DMU's sustainable design performance, our model can help identify the most eco-efficient way to improve the performance attributes of a product while minimizing its various negative impacts, such as greenhouse gas emissions, water pollution, and solid wastes, on the natural environment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available