4.7 Article

Price promotions, operations cost, and profit in a two-stage supply chain

Journal

OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 891-905

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2012.01.010

Keywords

Inventory control; Operations management

Funding

  1. Directorate For Engineering
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0927930] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phenomenon in which demand variability increases as one moves upstream in the supply chain has been often observed in practice. This so-called bullwhip effect often increases upstream operations costs, including inventory holding and transportation costs. Price variations are considered to be one of the primary causes of the bullwhip effect, and thus everyday low price (EDLP) strategies are commonly recommended to counter the negative impacts of the bullwhip effect. However, trade promotions continue to play an important role in the U.S. supermarket industry as well as other industries. This paper investigates this apparent inconsistency between the literature and practice by employing a deterministic, two-stage supply chain model composed of a single supplier and a single retailer. We demonstrate that even though the use of trade promotions can indeed increase a retailer's and supplier's operations costs, these costs may be more than offset by increased revenues, even in the absence of explicit coordination. That is, if the supplier judiciously applies a trade promotion strategy and the retailer passes some of this discount to its customers, then under certain conditions, the resulting supply chain profit can exceed that under an EDLP strategy. We provide a broad set of computational results that validate this conclusion and discuss the resulting managerial insights. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available