4.5 Article

Bryophytes display allelopathic interactions with tree species in native forest ecosystems

Journal

OIKOS
Volume 120, Issue 8, Pages 1272-1280

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.19148.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (FRST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bryophytes are widespread in terrestrial ecosystems but little is known about their influence on vascular species. Watersoluble leachates (0%, 1%, 5%, 10% concentration) derived from 18 species of bryophytes (mosses 11 species; liverworts 7 species) were tested on the germination and seedling growth of Lactuca sativa and two common trees Melicytus ramiflorus (Violaceae) and Fuchsia excorticata (Onagraceae) in southern New Zealand forests. Bryophyte water soluble extracts (BWSE) have minor impact on seed germination of Lactuca, stimulatory effects on radical growth at low (1%) concentrations and inhibitory effects at higher concentrations (5-10%). For Melicytus the BWSE had variable effects, with evidence of strong stimulatory (Dendrohypopterygium filiculiforme) and inhibitory (Lepidozia concinna) effects on germination, but generally inhibited radical growth. BWSE at all test concentrations consistently inhibit both germination and seedling radicle growth in Fuchsia. The toxicity effect of water-soluble leachates varies significantly between bryophyte species but not consistently between mosses and liverworts. Bryophyte species exhibiting strongest inhibition effects under control conditions were associated with significantly reduced densities of broadleaved tree seedlings in forest ecosystems. Our results demonstrate that some bryophyte species via allelopathic interactions can inhibit seedling establishment and growth of forest trees. This mechanism provides an additional factor constraining the spatial distribution of the regeneration niche in forest communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available