4.5 Article

Tradeoffs, competition, and coexistence in eastern deciduous forest ant communities

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 171, Issue 4, Pages 981-992

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2459-9

Keywords

Diurnal; Niche; Nocturnal; Segregation; Woodland

Categories

Funding

  1. DOE-PER [DE-FG02-08ER64510]
  2. DOE GREF
  3. EPA STAR program
  4. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Tennessee
  5. DOE SURE
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1136717, 1136703, 0953390] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ecologists have long sought to explain the coexistence of multiple potentially competing species in local assemblages. This is especially challenging in species-rich assemblages in which interspecific competition is intense, as it often is in ant assemblages. As a result, a suite of mechanisms has been proposed to explain coexistence among potentially competing ant species: the dominance-discovery tradeoff, the dominance-thermal tolerance tradeoff, spatial segregation, temperature-based niche partitioning, and temporal niche partitioning. Through a series of observations and experiments, we examined a deciduous forest ant assemblage in eastern North America for the signature of each of these coexistence mechanisms. We failed to detect evidence for any of the commonly suggested mechanisms of coexistence, with one notable exception: ant species appear to temporally partition foraging times such that behaviourally dominant species foraged more intensely at night, while foraging by subdominant species peaked during the day. Our work, though focused on a single assemblage, indicates that many of the commonly cited mechanisms of coexistence may not be general to all ant assemblages. However, temporal segregation may play a role in promoting coexistence among ant species in at least some ecosystems, as it does in many other organisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available