4.5 Article

Associational resistance and associational susceptibility: specialist herbivores show contrasting responses to tree stand diversification

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 169, Issue 2, Pages 477-487

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2215-6

Keywords

Competitor-free space; Diet breadth; Insect herbivory; Pasture reforestation; Tree diversity

Categories

Funding

  1. ETH North-South Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heterospecific neighbors may reduce damage to a focal plant by lowering specialist herbivore loads (associational resistance hypothesis), or enhance damage by increasing generalist herbivore loads (associational susceptibility hypothesis). We tested the associational effects of tree diversity on herbivory patterns of the tropical focal tree in an experimental plantation setup, which contained tree monocultures and mixed stands. We found higher herbivore damage to at higher tree diversity, indicating that did not benefit from associational resistance but rather experienced associational susceptibility. The specific consideration of the two dominant insect herbivore species of , the specialist chrysomelid and the specialist pyralid , facilitated understanding of the detected damage patterns Tree diversity exerted opposite effects on tree infestation by the two herbivores. These findings point to resource concentration effects for the chrysomelid beetle (favored by tree monoculture) and to resource dilution effects for the pyralid caterpillar (favored by tree mixture) as underlying mechanisms of herbivore distribution. A strong contribution of the pyralid to overall damage patterns in diversified stands suggests that associational susceptibility may not necessarily be related to higher abundances of generalist herbivores but may also result from specialized herbivores affected by resource dilution effects. Thus, the identity and biology of herbivore species has to be taken into account when attempting to predict damage patterns in forest ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available