4.5 Article

Dew water isotopic ratios and their relationships to ecosystem water pools and fluxes in a cropland and a grassland in China

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 168, Issue 2, Pages 549-561

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2091-0

Keywords

Stable isotope; Dew water; Water vapor; Leaf water; TDLAS; Flux partitioning

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2010CB833501]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30970517, 31070408]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-EW-QN305]
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation [ATM-0914473]
  5. Rice Family Foundation
  6. K.C. Wong Education Foundation, Hong Kong
  7. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [914473] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dew formation has the potential to modulate the spatial and temporal variations of isotopic contents of atmospheric water vapor, oxygen and carbon dioxide. The goal of this paper is to improve our understanding of the isotopic interactions between dew water and ecosystem water pools and fluxes through two field experiments in a wheat/maize cropland and in a short steppe grassland in China. Measurements were made during 94 dew events of the D and O-18 compositions of dew, atmospheric vapor, leaf, xylem and soil water, and the whole ecosystem water flux. Our results demonstrate that the equilibrium fractionation played a dominant role over the kinetic fractionation in controlling the dew water isotopic compositions. A significant correlation between the isotopic compositions of leaf water and dew water suggests a large role of top-down exchange with atmospheric vapor controlling the leaf water turnover at night. According to the isotopic labeling, dew water consisted of a downward flux of water vapor from above the canopy (98%) and upward fluxes originated from soil evaporation and transpiration of the leaves in the lower canopy (2%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available