4.5 Article

Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? The fallacy of true diversity

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 167, Issue 4, Pages 885-888

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2124-8

Keywords

Alpha diversity; Beta diversity; Gamma diversity; Diversity partitioning; Hill index

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is no single best index that can be used to answer all questions about species diversity. Entropy-based diversity indices, including Hill's indices, cannot account for geographical and phylogenetic structure. While a single diversity index arises if we impose several constraints-most notably that gamma diversity be completely decomposed into alpha and beta diversity-there are many ecological questions regarding species diversity for which it is counterproductive, requiring decomposability. Non-decomposable components of gamma diversity may quantify important intrinsic ecological properties, such as resilience or nestedness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available