4.5 Article

Leaf litter traits of invasive species slow down decomposition compared to Spanish natives: a broad phylogenetic comparison

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 162, Issue 3, Pages 781-790

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1512-9

Keywords

Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Lignin; Calcium; Phylogenetically independent contrast

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry for Education and Science [GL2004-04884-C0202/BOS, CGL2007-61873/BOS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leaf traits related to the performance of invasive alien species can influence nutrient cycling through litter decomposition. However, there is no consensus yet about whether there are consistent differences in functional leaf traits between invasive and native species that also manifest themselves through their after life effects on litter decomposition. When addressing this question it is important to avoid confounding effects of other plant traits related to early phylogenetic divergences and to understand the mechanism underlying the observed results to predict which invasive species will exert larger effects on nutrient cycling. We compared initial leaf litter traits, and their effect on decomposability as tested in standardized incubations, in 19 invasive-native pairs of co-familial species from Spain. They included 12 woody and seven herbaceous alien species representative of the Spanish invasive flora. The predictive power of leaf litter decomposition rates followed the order: growth form > family > status (invasive vs. native) > leaf type. Within species pairs litter decomposition tended to be slower and more dependent on N and P in invaders than in natives. This difference was likely driven by the higher lignin content of invader leaves. Although our study has the limitation of not representing the natural conditions from each invaded community, it suggests a potential slowing down of the nutrient cycle at ecosystem scale upon invasion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available