4.5 Article

Avian host community structure and prevalence of West Nile virus in Chicago, Illinois

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 159, Issue 2, Pages 415-424

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1224-6

Keywords

Dilution effect; Spatial scale; Sentinel species; Reservoir host; Host competence

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF/NIH [04-29124]
  2. Division Of Environmental Biology
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [0840403, GRANTS:13865074] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vertebrate host diversity has been postulated to mediate prevalence of zoonotic, vector-borne diseases, such that as diversity increases, transmission dampens. This dilution effect is thought to be caused by distribution of infective bites to incompetent reservoir hosts. We quantified avian species richness, avian seroprevalence for antibodies to West Nile virus (WNV), and infection of WNV in Culex mosquitoes, in the Chicago metropolitan area, Illinois, USA, a region of historically high WNV activity. Results indicated high overall avian seroprevalence and variation in seroprevalence across host species; however, there was no negative correlation between avian richness and Culex infection rate or between richness and infection status in individual birds. Bird species with high seroprevalence, especially northern cardinals and mourning doves, may be important sentinels for WNV in Chicago, since they were common and widespread among all study sites. Overall, our results suggest no net effect of increasing species richness to West Nile virus transmission in Chicago. Other intrinsic and extrinsic factors, such as variation in mosquito host preference, reservoir host competence, temperature, and precipitation, may be more important than host diversity for driving interannual variation in WNV transmission. These results from a fine-scale study call into question the generality of a dilution effect for WNV at coarser spatial scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available