4.6 Article

North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part I: Mean states

Journal

OCEAN MODELLING
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 76-107

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.10.005

Keywords

Global ocean-sea-ice modelling; Ocean model comparisons; Atmospheric forcing; Experimental design; Atlantic meridional overturning circulation; North Atlantic simulations

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. NSF
  3. U.S. Department of Energy
  4. NOAA Climate Program Office under Climate Variability
  5. Predictability Program [NA09OAR4310163]
  6. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency
  7. Bureau of Meteorology
  8. CSIRO
  9. National Computational Infrastructure facility at the Australian National University
  10. Research Council of Norway through the EarthClim [207711/E10]
  11. NOTUR/NorStore projects
  12. Centre for Climate Dynamics at the Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
  13. Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research
  14. Italian Ministry of Environment, Land, and Sea under the GEMINA project
  15. BNP-Paribas foundation via the PRECLIDE project under the CNRS [30023488]
  16. WGOMD
  17. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  18. Directorate For Geosciences [1118473] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  19. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  20. Directorate For Geosciences [1023499] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  21. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010010] Funding Source: researchfish
  22. NERC [noc010010] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simulation characteristics from eighteen global ocean-sea-ice coupled models are presented with a focus on the mean Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) and other related fields in the North Atlantic. These experiments use inter-annually varying atmospheric forcing data sets for the 60-year period from 1948 to 2007 and are performed as contributions to the second phase of the Coordinated Oceanice Reference Experiments (CORE-II). The protocol for conducting such CORE-II experiments is summarized. Despite using the same atmospheric forcing, the solutions show significant differences. As most models also differ from available observations, biases in the Labrador Sea region in upper-ocean potential temperature and salinity distributions, mixed layer depths, and sea-ice cover are identified as contributors to differences in AMOC. These differences in the solutions do not suggest an obvious grouping of the models based on their ocean model lineage, their vertical coordinate representations, or surface salinity restoring strengths. Thus, the solution differences among the models are attributed primarily to use of different subgrid scale parameterizations and parameter choices as well as to differences in vertical and horizontal grid resolutions in the ocean models. Use of a wide variety of sea-ice models with diverse snow and sea-ice albedo treatments also contributes to these differences. Based on the diagnostics considered, the majority of the models appear suitable for use in studies involving the North Atlantic, but some models require dedicated development effort. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available