4.6 Article

Evaluation of the Global Ocean Data Assimilation System at INCOIS: The Tropical Indian Ocean

Journal

OCEAN MODELLING
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 123-135

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.05.003

Keywords

Ocean modeling; Ocean data assimilation; Model validation; Model configuration; Tropical Indian Ocean; Wind sensitivity experiment

Funding

  1. Earth System Science Organization, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new version of NCEP's Global Ocean Data Assimilation System (GODAS), which is based on the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) Modular ocean Model version 4.0 (MOM4.0) and a three-dimensional variational (3D-VAR) data assimilation scheme, was configured and operationalized at Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS). The primary objective of the GODAS at INCOIS (INCOIS-GODAS) is to provide an accurate estimate of the ocean state, which will be used to initialize a coupled model for the seasonal monsoon forecast and also to understand the variability of the ocean at different time scales. In this paper, we assess the quality of ocean analyses in the Tropical Indian Ocean (TIO) obtained from the operational INCOIS-GODAS. In addition to this, we examined the sensitivity of INCOIS-GODAS to different momentum forcing and to the assimilation of temperature and synthetic salinity based on the experiments carried out with different wind products: NCEP2 and QuikSCAT and a free run respectively. The present study reveals that the model with assimilation simulates most of the observed features of temperature, SSHA and currents with reasonably good accuracy in the TIO at both intra-seasonal and inter-annual time scales. The analysis further shows that there was a considerable improvement in the ocean current field, when the model was forced with QuikSCAT winds. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available