4.7 Article

Load characteristics of steel and concrete tubular members under jet fire: An experimental and numerical study

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 37, Issue 13, Pages 1159-1168

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.05.006

Keywords

Jet fire load; Risk assessment; Computational fluid dynamics; Fire engineering; Floating; Production; Storage and Offloading (FPSO) unit

Funding

  1. EFEF JIP, Pusan National University (Korea)
  2. Hyundai Heavy Industries (Korea)
  3. Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering (Korea)
  4. American Bureau of Shipping (USA)
  5. Nowatec AS (Norway)
  6. Health and Safety Executive (UK)
  7. ComputIT (Norway)
  8. Gexcon (Norway)
  9. Korea Government (MEST) [K20901000005-09E0100-00510]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to evaluate the load characteristics of steel and concrete tubular members under jet fire, with the motivation to investigate the jet fire load characteristics in FPSO topsides. This paper is part of Phase II of the joint industry project on explosion and fire engineering of FPSOs (EFEF JIP) (Paik and Czujko, 2009; Paik, 2010). To obtain reliable load values, jet fire tests were carried out in parallel with a numerical study. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation was used to set up an adiabatic wall boundary condition for the jet fire to model the heat transfer mechanism. A concrete tubular member was tested under the assumption that there is no conduction effect from jet fire. A steel tubular member was tested and considered to transfer heat through conduction, convection, and radiation. The temperature distribution, or heat load, was analyzed at specific locations on each type of member. ANSYS CFX, (2008) and KFX, 2007 codes were used to obtain similar fire action in the numerical and experimental methods. The results of this study will provide a useful database to determine design values related to jet fire. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available