4.7 Article

Comparing resident and tourist preferences for public beach access and related amenities

Journal

OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 53, Issue 5-6, Pages 245-251

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.04.007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SC Department of Health and Environmental Control
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  3. U.S. Department of Commerce
  4. USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As coastal destinations continue to grow, due to tourism and residential expansion, the demand for public beach access and related amenities will also increase. The issue confronting management agencies responsible for providing and maintaining public beach access and related amenities is the varying needs and preferences of both residents and tourists of coastal destinations. The purpose of this paper is to provide comprehensive information about coastal recreational needs of residents and tourists with regards to public beach access and associated amenities using the stated preference choice method. Overall, the results indicate tourists were more interested in additional public beach access points and commercial development, while residents supported beach rules and regulations but opposed high levels of crowding and noise. Implications of these results for management agencies include the utilization of parking fees to subsidize additional public beach access points, identifying appropriate types and levels of commercial development that moderate the use of coastal resources by tourists and day-trip users, and implementing beach rules and regulations that reduce the potential for conflict between user groups. Providing management agencies with comprehensive information of the preferences of different beach user groups can assist in the development of more effective policies and management programs. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available