4.6 Article

Learning in university technology transfer offices: transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research

Journal

TECHNOVATION
Volume 41-42, Issue -, Pages 62-74

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.11.003

Keywords

University technology transfer; Research commercialization; Intellectual property; Situated learning; Community of practice; Practice change

Funding

  1. UK Economic and Social Research Council [ES/I900934/1]
  2. ESRC [ES/I900934/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

University Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs) need a wide range of abilities to facilitate commercial exploitation of research outputs; however, we know relatively little about how these important abilities are developed and refined over time. We draw on practice-based studies of learning to create a novel conceptualization of learning processes and their outcomes in TTOs and show that this conceptualization of learning provides new empirical insights into how learning in TTOs shapes their commercialization practice. We investigate learning-in-practice in case studies of six UK TTOs and find two approaches to commercialization, namely transactions-focused practice and relations-focused practice. We find that both practices co-exist and co-evolve in some TTOs while other TTOs are predominantly transactions-focused. For the latter the development of a relations-focused approach is difficult, but possible if there is strategic direction and if sources of inertia are removed by TTO directors. Given that evolving practice cannot be fully explained by informal learning processes, we suggest that so far separate streams of practice-based literature on learning and strategizing should be brought together. The implications for further investigations of TTO abilities and some recommendations for policy and practice are discussed. (c) 2015 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available