4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Differences in Primary Compared With Secondary Vestibulodynia by Immunohistochemistry

Journal

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 117, Issue 6, Pages 1307-1313

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c33dc

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [K12 HD043488-08, K12 HD043488] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether primary and secondary vestibulodynia represent different pathologic pathways. METHODS: This was an analysis of archived vestibulectomy specimens from 88 premenopausal women with vestibulodynia (2002-2008). Patient records were reviewed to classify the type of vestibulodynia, duration of symptoms, and hormone status. Histologic sections were stained for hematoxylin and eosin to grade inflammation, S100 to highlight nerves, CD117 for mast cells, estrogen receptor alpha, and progesterone receptor. Differences between primary and secondary vestibulodynia were tested by t tests, chi-square analysis, and linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: Primary vestibulodynia showed significant neural hypertrophy and hyperplasia (P = .02, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-7.6) and increased progesterone receptor nuclear immunostaining (P = .004, adjusted OR 3.94, CI 1.6-9.9) compared with secondary vestibulodynia. Estrogen receptor alpha expression was also greater in primary vestibulodynia when symptom diagnosis was less than 5 years (P = .004, adjusted OR 5.53 CI 1.71-17.91). CONCLUSION: Primary and secondary vestibulodynia have significantly different histologic features, suggesting that they may have separate mechanistic pathways. Clinically, this may mean the discovery of distinct conditions. (Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1307-13) DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c33dc

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available