4.4 Article

Endoscopic Internal Drainage with Enteral Nutrition (EDEN) for Treatment of Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

Journal

OBESITY SURGERY
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 1400-1407

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1298-7

Keywords

Bariatric surgery; Sleeve gastrectomy; Leak; Gastric leakage; Endoscopic internal drainage; Pigtail stent; Over-the-Scope Clip; Fistula

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endoscopic treatment of gastric leaks (GL) following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) involves different techniques; however, standard management is not yet established. We report our experience about endoscopic internal drainage of leaks using pigtail stents coupled with enteral nutrition (EDEN) for 4 to 6 weeks until healing is achieved. In 21 pts (18 F, 41 years), one or two plastic pigtail stents were delivered across the leak 25.6 days (4-98) post-surgery. In all patients, nasojejunal tube was inserted. Check endoscopy was done at 4 to 6 weeks with either restenting if persistent leak, or removal if no extravasation of contrast in peritoneal cavity, or closure with an Over-the-Scope ClipA (R) (OTSCA (R)) if contrast opacifying the crossing stent without concomitant peritoneal extravasation. Twenty-one out of 21 (100 %) patients underwent check endoscopy at average of 30.15 days (26-45) from stenting. In 7/21 (33.3 %) patients leak sealed, 2/7 needed OTSCA (R). Second check endoscopy, 26.7 days (25-42) later, showed sealed leak in 10 out 14; 6/10 had OTSCA (R). Four required restenting. One patient, 28 days later, needed OTSCA (R). One healed at 135 days and another 180 days after four and seven changes, respectively. One patient is currently under treatment. In 20/21 (95.2 %), GL have healed with EID treatment of 55.5 days (26-aEuro parts per thousand 180); all are asymptomatic on a normal diet at average follow-up of 150.3 days (20-276). EDEN is a promising therapeutic approach for treating leaks following SG. Multiple endoscopic sessions may be required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available