4.4 Article

Influence of the Learning Curve on Safety and Efficiency of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Journal

OBESITY SURGERY
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 411-415

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0436-8

Keywords

Morbid obesity; Bariatric surgery; Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; Surgical complications; Learning curve

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a relatively new bariatric procedure, and data regarding the learning curve are scarce. The aim of this study is to assess how the procedure can be safely implanted in a newly established bariatric unit and to define the learning curve. Proctorship and mentorship in bariatric surgery were attended by two surgeons who were previously experienced in advanced laparoscopic surgery. The first consecutive 102 patients who underwent LSG in our newly established bariatric center were included. Patients were divided into three groups of 34 (groups 1, 2, and 3) according to case sequence. Data on demographics, operative time, conversion rate, hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and excess weight loss (EWL) over time were compared between the groups. The operative time was significantly lower in groups 2 (p = 0.016) and 3 (p = 0.003) compared to group 1. The learning curve was flat up to the 68th case. A significant decrease in hospital stay was noted for group 3 compared to groups 1 (p < 0.001) and 2 (p = 0.002). The conversion rate, mortality and morbidity rates, and EWL did not differ significantly between the groups. Mortality was 0.98% and procedure-related morbidity was 7.8%. LSG can be safely and efficiently performed in a newly established bariatric center following a mentorship procedure. Proficiency seems to require 68 cases. The operative time and hospital stay may significantly decrease with experience early in the learning curve, as opposed to mortality and morbidity rates, conversion rate, and EWL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available