4.4 Article

Different Effect of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Open Biliopancreatic Diversion of Scopinaro on Serum PYY and Ghrelin Levels

Journal

OBESITY SURGERY
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1424-1429

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-008-9560-5

Keywords

PYY; Ghrelin; Obesity; Bariatric surgery

Categories

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CP04/00133]
  2. Ciber Fisiopatolog a Obesidad y Nutricion [CB06/03/0018]
  3. Ciber Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabolicas [CB07/08/0019]
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The impact of bariatric surgery on levels of peptide YY (PYY) and ghrelin is still under discussion. We undertook a simultaneous evaluation of the serum changes in PYY and ghrelin depending on the specific type of bariatric surgery. Methods Total PYY and ghrelin were analyzed in 29 healthy persons and in morbidly obese persons undergoing open biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) of Scopinaro (n=38) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB; n=13). Results RYGB resulted in a significantly greater loss of weight and body mass index than BPD. Both RYGB and BPD were associated with a significant increase in PYY, significantly greater for BDP (p=0.001). Ghrelin rose significantly after RYGB (p=0.022) but not after BPD. After surgery, PYY correlated positively with weight (r=0.416, p=0.009). Ghrelin did not correlate significantly with any of the variables studied. Analysis of variance showed that only the type of surgery contributed significantly to explain the variances in the PYY (p=0.002) and ghrelin (p=0.018). Conclusions BPD results in a greater increase in PYY and a lower weight loss than RYGB. However, only RYGB was associated with a significant increase in ghrelin. The differing weight loss according to the type of bariatric surgery does not seem to be explained by changes arising in PYY and ghrelin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available