Journal
OBESITY REVIEWS
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 983-995Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/obr.12225
Keywords
Meta-analysis; physical activity; social cognitive theory; systematic review
Categories
Funding
- Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship
- Hunter Medical Research Institute's Barker Scholarship
- Senior Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This review investigated three research questions (i) What is the utility of social cognitive theory (SCT) to explain physical activity (PA)?; (ii) Is the effectiveness of SCT moderated by sample or methodological characteristics? and (iii) What is the frequency of significant associations between the core SCT constructs and PA? Ten electronic databases were searched with no date or sample restrictions. Forty-four studies were retrieved containing 55 SCT models of PA. Methodological quality was assessed using a standardized tool. A random-effects meta-analysis revealed that SCT accounted for 31% of the variance in PA. However, methodological quality was mostly poor for these models. Methodological quality and sample age moderated the PA effect size, with increases in both associated with greater variance explained. Although self-efficacy and goals were consistently associated with PA, outcome expectations and socio-structural factors were not. This review determined that SCT is a useful framework to explain PA behaviour. Higher quality models explained more PA variance, but overall methodological quality was poor. As such, high-quality studies examining the utility of SCT to explain PA are warranted.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available