4.6 Review

Motivational interviewing to improve weight loss in overweight and/or obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal

OBESITY REVIEWS
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages 709-723

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00892.x

Keywords

Behaviour change; motivational interviewing; obesity; weight loss

Funding

  1. Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes
  2. Gerald Webber Cosmopolitan International Club
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. Health Senior Scholar award
  5. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivational interviewing, a directive, patient-centred counselling approach focused on exploring and resolving ambivalence, has emerged as an effective therapeutic approach within the addictions field. However, the effectiveness of motivational interviewing in weight-loss interventions is unclear. Electronic data-bases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating behaviour change interventions using motivational interviewing in overweight or obese adults. Standardized mean difference (SMD) for change in body mass, reported as either body mass index (BMI; kg m(-2)) or body weight (kg), was the primary outcome, with weighted mean difference (WMD) for change in body weight and BMI as secondary outcomes. The search strategy yielded 3540 citations and of the 101 potentially relevant studies, 12 met the inclusion criteria and 11 were included for meta-analysis. Motivational interviewing was associated with a greater reduction in body mass compared to controls (SMD = -0.51 [95% CI -1.04, 0.01]). There was a significant reduction in body weight (kg) for those in the intervention group compared with those in the control group (WMD = -1.47 kg [95% CI -2.05, -0.88]). For the BMI outcome, the WMD was -0.25 kg m(-2) (95% CI -0.50, 0.01). Motivational interviewing appears to enhance weight loss in overweight and obese patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available