4.3 Article

The impact of physician weight discussion on weight loss in US adults

Journal

OBESITY RESEARCH & CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages E131-E139

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2013.03.003

Keywords

Weight counseling; Weight loss; Primary care; Physician counseling

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [UL1RR033184, KL2RR033180]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Problem: The increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States and worldwide is at epidemic levels. Physicians may play a vital role in addressing this epidemic. We aimed to examine the association of a physician's discussion of patients' weight status with self-reported weight loss. We hypothesized that physician discussion of patients' being overweight is associated with increased weight loss in patients with overweight and obesity. Methods: Data analysis of participants (n = 5054) in the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) in 2005-2008. The main outcome was rates of self-reported weight loss and the association with physicians' discussion of their patients' weight status. Results: Overweight and obese participants were significantly more likely to report a 5% weight loss in the past year if their doctor had told them they were overweight (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.88; 95% CI 1.45-2.44; AOR 1.79; 95% CI 1.30-2.46, respectively). Conclusions: Physicians' direct discussion of their patients' weight status is associated with clinically significant patient weight loss and may be a targetable intervention. Further studies are needed to determine if increasing physician discussion of patients' weight status leads to significant weight loss. (C) 2013 Asian Oceanian Association for the Study of Obesity. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available