4.7 Article

Low-cost bioanalysis on paper-based and its hybrid microfluidic platforms

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages 43-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.04.068

Keywords

Low-cost bioassays; Paper-based microfluidic lab-on-a-chip; Paper hybrid microfluidic platform; Disease diagnosis; Food safety analysis

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R21AI107415]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH [SC2GM105584]
  3. IDR Program at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP)
  4. NIH RCMI Pilot Grant
  5. Key (Key grant) Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [313045]
  6. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2013DFG02930]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-cost assays have broad applications ranging from human health diagnostics and food safety inspection to environmental analysis. Hence, low-cost assays are especially attractive for rural areas and developing countries, where financial resources are limited. Recently, paper-based microfluidic devices have emerged as a low-cost platform which greatly accelerates the point of care (POC) analysis in low-resource settings. This paper reviews recent advances of low-cost bioanalysis on paper-based microfluidic platforms, including fully paper-based and paper hybrid microfluidic platforms. In this review paper, we first summarized the fabrication techniques of fully paper-based microfluidic platforms, followed with their applications in human health diagnostics and food safety analysis. Then we highlighted paper hybrid microfluidic platforms and their applications, because hybrid platforms could draw benefits from multiple device substrates. Finally, we discussed the current limitations and perspective trends of paper-based microfluidic platforms for low-cost assays. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available