4.7 Article

Inverse Association Between Diabetes and Altitude: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Adult Population of the United States

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 2080-2090

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.20800

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  3. Bonn-Bad Godesberg, Germany
  4. UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether geographical elevation is inversely associated with diabetes, while adjusting for multiple risk factors. Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of publicly available online data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2009. Final dataset included 285,196 US adult subjects. Odds ratios were obtained from multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis. Results: Among US adults (>= 20 years old), the odds ratio for diabetes was 1.00 between 0 and 499 m of altitude (reference), 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.01) between 500 and 1,499 m, and 0.88 (0.81-0.96) between 1,500 and 3,500 m, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, ethnicity, self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption, self-reported physical activity, current smoking status, level of education, income, health status, employment status, and county-level information on migration rate, urbanization, and latitude. The inverse association between altitude and diabetes in the US was found among men [0.84 (0.76-0.94)], but not women [1.09 (0.97-1.22)]. Conclusions: Among US adults, living at high altitude (1,500-3,500 m) is associated with lower odds of having diabetes than living between 0 and 499 m, while adjusting for multiple risk factors. Our findings suggest that geographical elevation may be an important factor linked to diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available