4.7 Article

Child Eating Behavior Outcomes of an Early Feeding Intervention to Reduce Risk Indicators for Child Obesity: The NOURISH RCT

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages E104-E111

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.20693

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [426704]
  2. post-doctoral fellowship
  3. Meat & Livestock Australia KMM
  4. Department of Health South Australia (MLA)
  5. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ)
  6. NHMRC Career Development Award [390136]
  7. Queensland University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The objective was to describe parent-reported child eating behavior and maternal parenting impact outcomes of an infant feeding intervention to reduce child obesity risk. Methods: An assessor masked Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) with concealed allocation of individual mother-infant dyads. The NOURISH RCT enrolled 698 first-time mothers (mean age 30.1 years, SD = 5.3) with healthy term infants (51% female) aged 4.3 months (SD = 1.0) at baseline. Outcomes were assessed 6 months post-intervention when the children were 2 years old. Mothers reported on child eating behaviors using the Children's Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ), food preferences, and dietary intake using a 24-hour telephone recall. Parenting was assessed using five scales validated for use in Australia. Results: Intervention effects were evident on the CEBQ overall (MANOVA P = 50.002) and 4/8 subscales: child satiety responsiveness (P = 0.03), fussiness (P = 0.01), emotional overeating (P< 0.01), and food responsiveness ( P = 0.06). Intervention children liked more fruits (P< 0.01) and fewer non-core foods and beverages (P = 0.06, 0.03). The intervention mothers reported greater autonomy encouragement (P = 0.002). Conclusions: Anticipatory guidance on protective feeding practices appears to have modest positive impacts on child eating behaviors that are postulated to reduce future obesity risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available