4.7 Article

Decision-Making, Sensitivity to Reward and Attrition in Weight Management

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 1904-1909

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.20770

Keywords

Iowa gambling task; obesity; weight management; sensitivity to reward; attrition; decision making

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [R01DA023051]
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [R01CA152062]
  3. National Heart, Lung, & Blood Institute
  4. National Institute of Child Health & Human Development [U01HL097839]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveAttrition is a common problem in weight management. Understanding the risk factors for attrition should enhance professionals' ability to increase completion rates and improve health outcomes for more individuals. A model that draws upon neuropsychological knowledge on reward-sensitivity in obesity and overeating to predict attrition is proposed. MethodsA total of 52 participants in a weight-management program completed a complex decision-making task. Decision-making characteristicsincluding sensitivity to rewardwere further estimated using a quantitative model. Impulsivity and risk-taking measures were also administered. ResultsConsistent with the hypothesis that sensitivity to reward predicted attrition, program dropouts had higher sensitivity to reward than completers (P < 0.03). No differences were observed between completers and dropouts in initial BMI, age, employment status, or the number of prior weight-loss attempts (P 0.07). Completers had a slightly higher education level than dropouts, but its inclusion in the model did not increase predictive power. Impulsivity, delay of gratification, and risk taking did not predict attrition, either. ConclusionsFindings link attrition in weight management to the neural mechanisms associated with reward-seeking and related influences on decision-making. Individual differences in the magnitude of response elicited by rewards may account for the relative difficulty experienced by dieters in adhering to treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available