4.7 Article

Combined Effects of Oligofructose and Bifidobacterium animalis on Gut Microbiota and Glycemia in Obese Rats

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 763-771

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.20632

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 115076]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Alberta Innovates Health Solutions (AIHS)
  4. CIHR Training Program Fellowship from Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute for Child and Maternal Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Prebiotics and probiotics may be able to modify an obesity-associated gut microbiota. The aim of this study was to examine the individual and combined effects of the prebiotic oligofructose (OFS) and the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 (BB-12) on gut microbiota and host metabolism in obese rats. Methods: Adult male, diet-induced obese Sprague Dawley rats were randomized to: (1) Control (C); (2) 10% OFS; (3) BB-12; (4) OFS + BB-12 for 8 weeks (n = 9-10 rats/group). Body composition, glycemia, gut permeability, satiety hormones, cytokines, and gut microbiota were examined. Results: Prebiotic, but not probiotic reduced energy intake, weight gain, and fat mass (P < 0.01). OFS, BB-12, and the combined OFS 1 BB-12 improved glycemia (P < 0.05). Individually, OFS and BB-12 reduced insulin levels (P < 0.05). Portal GLP-1 was increased with OFS, whereas probiotic increased GLP-2 (P < 0.05). There was a marked increase in bifidobacteria and lactobacilli (P < 0.01) with OFS that was not observed with probiotic alone. Conclusions: The impact of prebiotic intake on body composition and gut microbiota was of greater magnitude than the probiotic BB-12. Despite this, an improvement in glucose AUC with both prebiotic or probiotic demonstrates the beneficial role of each of these biotic agents in glycemic control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available