4.7 Article

Coulometric differential FFT admittance voltammetry determination of Amlodipine in pharmaceutical formulation by nano-composite electrode

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 131, Issue -, Pages 577-584

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.07.033

Keywords

Fast Fourier transformation coulometric admittance voltammetry; Ionic liquid; Au nano-particles; Amlodipine; Multiwall carbon nanotube

Funding

  1. Research Council of University of Tehran [6102027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An electrochemical detection technique based on combination of was coulometric differential fast Fourier transformation admittance voltammetry (CDFFTAV) and nano-composite film modified glassy carbon electrode was successfully applied for sensitive determination of Amlodipine. The nano-composite film was made by a mixture of ionic liquid, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMIMBF4), multiwall carbon nanotube and Au nanoparticles as electrochemical mediators. Studies reveal that the irreversible oxidation of Amlodipine was highly facile on the electrode surface. The electrochemical response was established on calculation of the charge under the admittance peak, which was obtained by discrete integration of the admittance response in a selected potential range, obtained in a flow injection analysis. Once established the best operative optimum conditions, the resulting nano-composite film electrode showed a catalytic effect on the oxidation of the analyte. The response is linear in the Amlodipine concentration range of 1.0 x 10(-9) to 2.0 x 10(-7) M with a detection limit of 1.25 x 10(-10) M. Moreover, the proposed technique exhibited high sensitivity, fast response time (less than 6 s) and long-term stability and reproducibility around 96%, and it was successfully used to the determination of Amlodipine content in the pharmaceutical formulation. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available