4.7 Article

Regional Adipose Tissue Associations With Calcified Atherosclerotic Plaque: African American-Diabetes Heart Study

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages 2004-2009

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.30

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. General Clinical Research Center of the Wake Forest University School of Medicine [M01 RR07122]
  2. NIDDK [RO1 DK071891]
  3. NIAMS [RO1 AR048797]
  4. NHLBI [R01 HL67348]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coronary artery calcified atherosclerotic plaque (CP) is strongly associated with nonsubcutaneous adipose tissue, particularly pericardial adipose tissue (PAT), in community-based studies. We tested for relationships between regional adipose tissue depots and CP in African Americans with longstanding type 2 diabetes. Infrarenal aorta, coronary, and carotid artery CP and pericardial, visceral, intermuscular, and subcutaneous organ-specific adipose tissue volumes were measured using single and multidetector computed tomography (CT) in 422 African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Generalized estimating equations using exchangeable correlation and the sandwich estimator of the variance were used to test for associations between CP and adipose tissue depots. Mean (s.d.) age was 56.5 (7.6) years, diabetes duration 10.3 (7.6) years, PAT 85.3 (36.1) cm(3)/45 mm and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) 174.9 (70.1) cm(3)/15 mm. Adjusting for age, gender, BMI, blood pressure, medications, proteinuria, smoking, lipids, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D, PAT was positively associated with the presence (P = 0.009) and quantity of coronary artery CP in African Americans (P = 0.004), as well as the quantity of infrarenal aorta CP (P = 0.004). As in European Americans, PAT is associated with CP in African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Ethnic differences in the relationships between organ-specific adipose tissue depots and atherosclerosis require further study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available