4.7 Article

Short-Term Effects of Dietary Fatty Acids on Muscle Lipid Composition and Serum Acylcarnitine Profile in Human Subjects

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 305-311

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.135

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 DK55384, R01 DK073284]
  2. General Clinical Research Center at the University of Vermont [M01 RR00109]
  3. Duke University [R01 AG028930]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In cultured cells, palmitic acid (PA) and oleic acid (OA) confer distinct metabolic effects, yet, unclear, is whether changes in dietary fat intake impact cellular fatty acid (FA) composition. We hypothesized that short-term increases in dietary PA or OA would result in corresponding changes in the FA composition of skeletal muscle diacylglycerol (DAG) and triacylglycerol (TAG) and/or the specific FA selected for beta-oxidation. Healthy males (N = 12) and females (N = 12) ingested a low-PA diet for 7 days. After fasting measurements of the serum acylcarnitine (AC) profile, subjects were randomized to either high-PA (HI PA) or low-PA/high-OA (HI OA) diets. After 7 days, the fasting AC measurement was repeated and a muscle/fat biopsy obtained. FA composition of intramyocellular DAG and TAG and serum AC was measured. HI PA increased, whereas HI OA decreased, serum concentration of 16: 0 AC (P < 0.001). HI OA increased 18:1 AC (P = 0.005). HI PA was associated with a higher PA/OA ratio in muscle DAG and TAG (DAG: 1.03 +/- 0.24 vs. 0.46 +/- 0.08, P = 0.04; TAG: 0.63 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.03, P = 0.01). The PA concentration in the adipose tissue DAG (mu g/mg adipose tissue) was 0.17 +/- 0.02 in those receiving the HI PA diet (n = 6), compared to 0.11 +/- 0.02 in the HI OA group (n = 4) (P = 0.067). The relative PA concentration in muscle DAG and TAG and the serum palmitoylcarnitine concentration was higher in those fed the high-PA diet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available