4.6 Review

Evidence and knowledge gaps for the association between energy drink use and high-risk behaviors among adolescents and young adults

Journal

NUTRITION REVIEWS
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages 87-97

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1111/nure.12129

Keywords

adolescents; caffeine; energy drinks; energy shots; risk-taking behavior

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01DA014845, R01DA001411]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sales of energy drinks have increased rapidly since their introduction to the marketplace in the 1990s. Despite the health concerns raised about these beverages, which are often highly caffeinated, surprisingly little data are available to estimate the prevalence of their use. This review presents the results of secondary data analyses of a nationally representative data set of schoolchildren in the United States and reviews the available research on the association between energy drink use and risk-taking behaviors. Approximately one-third of the students surveyed were recent users of energy drinks, with substantial variation by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Among the health and safety concerns related to energy drinks and their consumption is the possible potentiation of risk-taking behaviors. The review of available research reveals that, although there does appear to be a strong and consistent positive association between the use of energy drinks and risk-taking behavior, all but one of the available studies used cross-sectional designs, thereby limiting the ability to make inferences about the temporal nature of the association. Thus, more research is needed to understand the nature of this association and how energy drinks, particularly those containing caffeine, might impact adolescent health and safety, especially given the high prevalence of their use among youth. (C) 2014 International Life Sciences Institute

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available