4.7 Article

Microfluidic system for high-throughput immunoglobulin-E analysis from clinical serum samples

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages 83-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.05.014

Keywords

Microfluidic; Asthma; Immunoglobulin-E; Array; Automation

Funding

  1. Key Programs for Science and Technology Development of Shanghai [11441901700]
  2. NSFC [21377026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapid and high-throughput analytical techniques for IgE that requires a small serum amount are very important, especially for pediatric patients. In these patients, blood is collected from veins, which is painful compared to fingertip blood collection. Herein, a novel microfluidic system capable of high-throughput parallel analyses of allergen-specific IgE from small amounts of patient serum was successfully developed. A six-plex immunoassay was constructed within a microfluidic chip, and the entire system was validated using samples from clinical patients. Major antigens from house dust mite (Dermatophagoides farinae and Blomia tropicalis), cat (Fells domesticus), fungus (Cladosporium herbarum), ragweed (Humulus japonicas), and tree pollen (Platanus acerzfolia) were used as analysis targets. Sample consumption decreased to < 0.05 mu L compared with the 480 mu L serum consumption by fluoroenzyme immunoassay (UniCAP system Pharmacia Diagnostics AB, Uppsala, Sweden), the 50 mu L serum con, sumption by enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA), or the 1.5 mu L serum consumption by conventional protein chip analysis. Analysis duration, reagent cost, and total cost for each measurement were also considerably decreased. The assay showed good accuracy and sensitivity toward the clinical samples. A significant correlation of allergen-specific IgE levels was found among the microfluidic assay, UniCAP system, and ELISA. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available