4.6 Review

Conjugated linoleic acids: why the discepancy between animal and human studies?

Journal

NUTRITION REVIEWS
Volume 66, Issue 7, Pages 415-421

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00051.x

Keywords

animal studies; body weight; conjugated linoleic acid; fat loss; human clinical trials; metabolism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conjugated linoleic acids (CLA) ore positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid. In animals, CLA consumption reduces body fat but results in humans are less conclusive. This review of the literature on CLA and loss of body fat or body weight in humans was conducted to explore the reasons for the discrepancy between animal and clinical trials. It indicates that the incongruity between human and animal data is largely related to methodological differences in the experimental design, including age and gender and, to a lesser extent, to CLA dose and isomers. The relatively unknown metabolic fate of CLA in humans may also be a contributing factor that helps explain the lack of consistency for CLA efficacy across studies. (c) 2008 International Life Sciences Institute.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available