4.5 Article

Sarcopenic obesity is associated with adverse clinical outcome after cardiac surgery

Journal

NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 511-518

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2011.12.001

Keywords

Sarcopenic obesity; Cardiac surgery; Fat free mass index; Fat mass index; Handgrip strength; Clinical outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & aims: Both undernutrition - low fat free mass (FFM) - and obesity - high fat mass (FM) - have been associated with adverse outcome in cardiac surgical patients. However, whether there is an additional effect on outcome of these risk factors present at the same time, that is sarcopenic obesity (SO), is unknown. Furthermore, the association between SO and muscle function is unidentified. Methods and results: In 325 cardiac surgical patients, we prospectively analysed the association between preoperative FFM and FM, measured by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy, and postoperative adverse outcomes, and their correlation with muscle function - handgrip strength (HGS). SO was associated with postoperative infections (28.2% vs. 5.3%, adj. odds ratio (OR): 7.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-54.1; p = 0.04). Further, a low FFM index (FFMI; kg m(-2)) was associated with postoperative infections (18.5% vs. 4.7%, adj. OR: 6.6; 95% CI: 1.7-25.2; p = 0.01) while a high FM index (FMI; kgm(-2)) was not. Both components of SO, FFMI and FMI, correlated with HGS (FFMI: r = 0.570; p < 0.001, FMI: r = -0.263; p < 0.001). Conclusion: SO is associated with an increased occurrence of adverse outcome after cardiac surgery. Our results suggest an additional risk of a low FFMI and high FMI present at the same time. Furthermore, SO is characterised by less muscle function. We advocate determining body composition in cardiac surgical patients to classify and treat undernourished patients, in particular those who are also obese. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available