4.5 Article

Dipeptydil peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Journal

NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 224-235

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.03.015

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitors; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Abiogen Pharma
  2. Glaxo-Smith-Kline
  3. Guidotti
  4. Eli Lilly
  5. Menarini
  6. Merck Sharp Et Dome (manufacturer of sitagliptin)
  7. Merck KgA
  8. Novo Nordisk
  9. Novartis (manufacturer of vildagliptin)
  10. Sanofi Aventis
  11. Takeda

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aim: The role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes is debated; many recent trials, which were not included in previous meta-analyses, could add relevant information. Methods and Results: All available randomized controlled trials (RCTs), either published or unpublished, performed in type 2 diabetic patients with DPP-4 inhibitors, with a duration >12 weeks were meta-analyzed for HbA1c, BMI, hypoglycemia, and other adverse events. A total of 41 RCTs (9 of which are unpublished) was retrieved and included in the analysis. Gliptins determine a significant improvement of HbA1c in comparison with a placebo (-0.7 [-0.8:-0.6]), with a low risk of hypoglycemia. DPP-4 inhibitors show a similar efficacy in monotherapy and in combination with other agents. The risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause death with DPP-4 inhibitors is 0.76 [0.46-1.28] and 0.78 [0.40-1.51], respectively. Conclusions: DPP-4 inhibitors reduce HbA1c, although to a lesser extent than sulphonylureas, with no weight gain and no hypoglycemic risk; further data are needed to assess their long-term safety. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available