4.5 Article

Comparison of epicardial, abdominal and regional fat compartments in response to weight loss

Journal

NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages 760-766

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.01.010

Keywords

Weight loss; Abdominal fat; Epicardial fat; Regional fat; Obese men

Funding

  1. Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [20650112]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20650112] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aims: Echocardiographic measurement of epicardial fat (EF) seems to be a reliable and diagnostic marker of visceral. adipose tissue (VAT). However, the weight loss-induced changes in EF have not been compared with those in VAT or the truncal. depot. In this study, we aimed to compare the weight loss-induced changes in EF, VAT and other regional fat compartments in obese men. Methods and results: In this study, 27 moderately obese men (age 45.8 +/- 1.7 years; body mass index 30.5 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2)) followed a daily low-calorie diet as part of a clinical. 12-week weight loss interventional. study. We evaluated the EF thickness by transthoracic echocardiography, assessed the abdominal fat tissues by computed tomography scans, and examined the regional and whole body fat compartments by dual X-ray absorptiometry. An average decrease of 26.8% in the initial calorie intake corresponded to post-program reductions of 17.2%, 11.0%, 16.6%, and 29.8% in EF thickness (P < 0.001), body mass, percentage fat mass, and abdominal fat compartments, respectively. The percentage change in VAT in response to weight loss was twice as high as the substantial. change in EF tissue (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that a low-calorie diet-induced weight toss decreases EF thickness. Moderate diet-induced weight loss alone may represent an effective nonpharmacological strategy for reducing EF, which is a unique, pathogenic fat depot and an emerging marker of VAT. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available