4.5 Article

Hydroxyhydroquinone-free coffee: A double-blind, randomized controlled dose-response study of blood pressure

Journal

NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 408-414

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2007.03.004

Keywords

chlorogenic acid; hydroxyhydroquinone; coffee; hypertension; randomized controlled trial

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aim: Coffee is rich in chlorogenic acids (CGA), whose metabolites may have beneficial effects such as anti -hypertensive effects. However, trial results concerning the effects of coffee on blood pressure (BP) are not consistent. A recent study suggested that hydroxyhydroquinone (HHQ), produced by the roasting of green coffee beans, inhibits the effect of CGA. In the present study, the dose-response for CGA in HHQ-free coffee on BP were investigated in mildly hypertensive men and women. Methods and results: The trial design was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, with five study groups including, control, zero-dose, Low-dose, middle-dose and high-dose. The control beverage was identical to ordinary coffee. The others contained reduced HHQ levels, compared to ordinary coffee, and the CGA were adjusted in target concentration. A total of 203 subjects were randomly allocated. Each subject drank one cup of coffee per day. The study involved a screening and a baseline observation period of 6 weeks and an intervention period of 4 weeks. BP response showed CGA has an anti -hypertensive effect in a dose-dependent manner in HHQ-free coffee, and ordinary coffee showed almost no effect. As a result, a significant correlation between BP change and the three dose-response patterns was observed (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates a dose-dependent decrease in BP for CGA in HHQ-free coffee. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available