4.5 Article

Polypyrrole-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes for the simple preparation of counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells

Journal

SYNTHETIC METALS
Volume 210, Issue -, Pages 323-331

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.10.020

Keywords

Dye-sensitized solar cell; Counter electrode; Polypyrrole; Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; low-cost deposition

Funding

  1. Slovak Grant Agency [VEGA 1/0818/13, VEGA 1/0051/13, VEGA 02/0149/14]
  2. National Centrum of Research and Application of Renewable Sources of Energy [ITMS 26240120016]
  3. Fund of European Regional Development
  4. COST [MP 1307]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polypyrrole-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (PPy/MWCNT) were synthesized using a three-step chemical oxidative polymerization and were simply deposited by an ex situ method from n-butyl alcohol dispersions onto conducting FTO glasses to be used as a low-cost replacement for Pt counter electrodes (CE) in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). PPy/MWCNT CEs, compared to PPy CEs, have significantly higher interlayer cohesion and adhesion to the Fro substrate, which increases with the MWCNT ratio. The network structure of PPy/MWCNT CEs, with a larger surface area compared to PPy CEs (characterized by SEM), has a positive effect on the charge transfer resistance (R-ct), and the PPy/MWCNT CE sample with a ratio of 70:30 reaches a lower R-ct than the standard Pt CE, as measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. PPy/MWCNT CEs have reasonable catalytic activities and good stability in the presence of an iodide/triiodide electrolyte, as measured by cyclic voltammetry. The conversion efficiency of the DSSC with PPy/MWCNT (70:30) CEs reaches a similar to 10 x higher value (eta = 4.9%) than the DSSC with pristine PPy CEs (eta = 0.5%) and a similar to 30% lower value than the standard DSSC with Pt CEs (eta = 7.1%). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available