4.3 Article

Green Tea Consumption and Breast Cancer Risk in Japanese Women: A Case-Control Study

Journal

NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 57-67

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2014.847963

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [221S0001, 22700934]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  4. Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research in Japan
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22700934] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although many in vitro and animal studies have suggested a protective effect of green tea against breast cancer, only a few epidemiological studies have examined this association, and findings have been inconsistent. We examined the association between green tea consumption and breast cancer risk in consideration of the hormone receptor status of tumors and investigated whether the association was modified by dietary and genetic factors based on a hospital-based case-control study in Nagano, Japan. A total of 369 pairs completed a validated food frequency questionnaire and provided blood samples. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped: CYP19A1 (rs10046), COMT (rs4680), MTHFR C677T (rs1801133), and MTHFR A1298C (rs1801131). We found no inverse association between green tea consumption and breast cancer risk. Compared with women who drank less than 120ml of green tea per day, the adjusted odds ratio for women who drank more than 600ml was 1.27 (95% confidence interval = 0.75-2.14; P for trend = 0.20). We also found no inverse association for either tumor subtype. No substantial effect modification was observed for menopausal status, 4 SNPs, or dietary intake of folate or isoflavone. This study provides additional evidence that green tea consumption is not associated with a decreased risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available