4.3 Article

Oral Resveratrol Therapy Inhibits Cancer-Induced Skeletal Muscle and Cardiac Atrophy In Vivo

Journal

NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages 749-762

Publisher

LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC INC-TAYLOR & FRANCIS
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2011.563032

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of North Carolina Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery
  2. University of North Carolina
  3. American Heart Association
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL104129]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism by which cancer mediates muscle atrophy has been delineated in the past 3 decades and includes a prominent role of tumor-derived cytokines, such as IL-6, TNF alpha, and IL-I. These cytokines interact with their cognate receptors on muscle to activate the downstream transcription factor NF-kappa B and induce sarcomere proteolysis. Experimentally, inhibiting NF-kappa B signaling largely prevents cancer-induced muscle wasting, indicating its prominent role in muscle atrophy. Resveratrol, a natural phytoalexin found in the skin of grapes, has recently been shown to inhibit NF-kappa B in cancer cells, which led us to hypothesize that it might have a protective role in cancer cachexia. Therefore, we investigated whether daily oral resveratrol could protect against skeletal muscle loss and cardiac atrophy in an established mouse model. We demonstrate resveratrol inhibits skeletal muscle and cardiac atrophy induced by C26 adenocarcinoma tumors through its inhibition of NF-kappa B (p65) activity in skeletal muscle and heart. These studies demonstrate for the first time the utility of oral resveratrol therapy to provide clinical benefit in cancer-induced atrophy through the inhibition of NF-kappa B in muscle. These findings may have application in the treatment of diseases with parallel pathophysiologies such as muscular dystrophy and heart failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available