4.4 Article

Soil mineral nitrogen availability predicted by herbage yield and disease resistance in red clover (Trifolium pratense) cropping

Journal

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS
Volume 112, Issue 3, Pages 303-315

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-018-9947-1

Keywords

Red clover; Forage legume; Soil fertility; Nitrogen fixation; Soil mineral nitrogen

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen (N) is the most limiting nutrient in crop production. Legumes such as red clover can provide N through biofixation, but securing nitrogen in soil for subsequent crop production must also be considered. Variety selection and management in red clover cropping can influence soil mineral nitrogen (SMN) availability. A field trial to investigate this was conducted with six varieties, under one and two cut management, over 2years. Dry matter (DM) and N yield, Sclerotinia resistance and SMN availability were assessed. Low DM and N yields (1.6-2.4tDMha(-1) and 54-83kgNha(-1)) in the first year of cultivation allowed similar to 40kgNha(-1) to become available, but high DM and N yields (10.2-14.6tDMha(-1) and 405-544kgNha(-1)) allowed similar to 20kgNha(-1) to become available. Wetter weather in 2015 caused significantly more SMN losses than 2016 (20kgNha(-1) in 2015 and 5kgNha(-1) in 2016). The varieties Amos, Maro and Milvus lost significantly more SMN in the winter period, which may have been caused by more severe infection of Sclerotinia (these varieties were 50-80% more severely infected other varieties). Varietal effect was non-significant for winter losses in 2016, where no significantvarietal differences in Sclerotinia infection were observed. 1 cut made similar to 41kgNha(-1) available in the growing season of 2015, whilst 2 cut made significantly less (37kgNha(-1)). Cutting was non-significant in 2016 but 1 cut was less susceptible to losses in the winter period. Cutting in 2015 did not significantly affect herbage DM and N yields in the first or second cut of 2016.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available