4.4 Article

Nutrient dynamics through fine litterfall in three plantations in Sabah, Malaysia, in relation to nutrient supply to surface soil

Journal

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages 381-395

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-010-9364-6

Keywords

Element flux; Tropical plantations; Soil amelioration; Old fast-wood plantation; Leguminous trees

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate soil amelioration effects by older tropical fast-wood plantations, we examined the fine litterfall and accompanying nutrient flux of a 20-year-old Acacia mangium site over 3 years under a wet tropical climate in Sabah, Malaysia. The litterfall of a Swietenia macrophylla site and an Araucaria cunninghamii site was also examined for comparison. Annual nitrogen (N) flux through litterfall (kg N ha(-1)) was larger in A. mangium (207-223) than in S. macrophylla (126-153) or A. cunninghamii (72-94), whereas annual phosphorus (P) flux through litterfall (kg P ha(-1)) was considerably smaller in A. mangium (2.7-3.4) than in S. macrophylla (7.5-15.6) or A. cunninghamii (7.8-9.2). N flux through litterfall, forest floor N, and N concentration in topsoil (0-5 cm) were in the order of A. mangium > S. macrophylla > A. cunninghamii, but other element fluxes were not related to concentrations in soils. Our findings suggest that topsoil N increased because of a large N flux from litterfall. We conclude that these plantation trees, including A. mangium have the potential to produce a N flux in litterfall for the rapid return of organic N to soils larger than or equivalent to that in adjacent primary forests. However, the litterfall of a single species may lead to deficits of a particular element and cause nutrient imbalances. Using a mixture of fertilizer tree species or applying mixed litter might be a better solution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available