4.4 Article

Fluxes of nitrous oxide from soil under different crop rotations and tillage systems in the South of Brazil

Journal

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages 161-173

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-008-9178-y

Keywords

Conventional tillage; Ferralsol; IPCC N2O Emission factors; Maize; Nitrous oxide emissions; Soybean; Vetch; Wheat; Zero tillage

Categories

Funding

  1. Embrapa
  2. Rio de Janeiro State Research Foundation (FAPERJ)
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [12978]
  4. Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq)
  5. BJRA
  6. SU
  7. RMB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The zero tillage (ZT) system is used in a large area (> 24 Mha) of crop production in Brazil. This management system can contribute to soil C sequestration, but many studies in other countries have registered greater nitrous oxide emissions under ZT compared to conventional tillage (CT), which may reduce greenhouse gas mitigation benefits. The aim of this study was to estimate the emission of N2O from cropping systems under conventional and zero tillage in an 18-year-old experiment conducted on a Rhodic Ferralsol in the South of Brazil. Fluxes of N2O were measured over two years using static-closed chambers in the two tillage systems with three crop rotations. Soil water filled pore space (% WFPS) and soil mineral N were monitored along with rainfall and air temperature. Estimates of N2O emissions were obtained by integrating the fluxes with time and also by applying the IPCC direct emission factor (EF1 = 1%) to the amounts of N added as fertilisers and returned as crop residues. Fluxes of N2O were relatively low, apart from a short period at the beginning of measurements. No relationship between N2O fluxes and % WFPS or mineral N were observed. Nitrous oxide emissions were not influenced either by tillage system or crop rotation. For the crop rotation receiving high rates of N fertiliser in the second year, field-measured N2O emissions were significantly underestimated by the IPCC emission factor 1 (EF1). For the other treatments measured N2O emissions fell within the EF1 uncertainty range, but always considerably lower than the EF1 estimate, which suggests IPCC EF1 overestimates true N2O emissions for the Ferralsol under evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available