4.8 Article

iProX: an integrated proteome resource

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue D1, Pages D1211-D1217

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky869

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research Program of China [2016YFC0901701, 2016YFB0201702, 2016YFC0901601]
  2. International Scientific and Technological Cooperation project of China [2014DFB30010, 2014DFB30030]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA020108]
  4. National Science Foundation of China [21475150]
  5. BBSRC International Partnering Award [BB/N022432/1]
  6. BBSRC [BB/N022432/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sharing of research data in public repositories has become best practice in academia. With the accumulation of massive data, network bandwidth and storage requirements are rapidly increasing. The ProteomeXchange (PX) consortium implements a mode of centralized metadata and distributed raw data management, which promotes effective data sharing. To facilitate open access of proteome data worldwide, we have developed the integrated proteome resource iProX (http://www.iprox.org) as a public platform for collecting and sharing raw data, analysis results and metadata obtained from proteomics experiments. The iProX repository employs a web-based proteome data submission process and open sharing of mass spectrometry-based proteomics datasets. Also, it deploys extensive controlled vocabularies and ontologies to annotate proteomics datasets. Users can use a GUI to provide and access data through a fast Aspera-based transfer tool. iProX is a full member of the PX consortium; all released datasets are freely accessible to the public. iProX is based on a high availability architecture and has been deployed as part of the proteomics infrastructure of China, ensuring long-term and stable resource support. iProX will facilitate worldwide data analysis and sharing of proteomics experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available