4.8 Article

LncRNAWiki: harnessing community knowledge in collaborative curation of human long non-coding RNAs

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue D1, Pages D187-D192

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1167

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB13040500, XDB13040000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31200978]
  3. Base Research Fund of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
  4. '100-Talent Program' of Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y1SLXb1365]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) perform a diversity of functions in numerous important biological processes and are implicated in many human diseases. In this report we present lncRNAWiki (http://lncrna.big.ac.cn), a wiki-based platform that is open-content and publicly editable and aimed at community-based curation and collection of information on human lncRNAs. Current related databases are dependent primarily on curation by experts, making it laborious to annotate the exponentially accumulated information on lncRNAs, which inevitably requires collective efforts in community-based curation of lncRNAs. Unlike existing databases, lncRNAWiki features comprehensive integration of information on human lncRNAs obtained from multiple different resources and allows not only existing lncRNAs to be edited, updated and curated by different users but also the addition of newly identified lncRNAs by any user. It harnesses community collective knowledge in collecting, editing and annotating human lncRNAs and rewards community-curated efforts by providing explicit authorship based on quantified contributions. LncRNAWiki relies on the underling knowledge of scientific community for collective and collaborative curation of human lncRNAs and thus has the potential to serve as an up-to-date and comprehensive knowledgebase for human lncRNAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available