4.8 Article

PLAZA 3.0: an access point for plant comparative genomics

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue D1, Pages D974-D981

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku986

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [FOR 948, MU 1199/14-2]
  2. Ghent University [Multidisciplinary Research Partnership 'Bioinformatics] [01MR0310W]
  3. Multidisciplinary Research Partnership 'Biotechnology for a Sustainable Economy' [01MRB510W]
  4. Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds Methusalem [BOF08/01M00408]
  5. European Research Council [European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)]
  6. ERC [339341-AMAIZE 11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparative sequence analysis has significantly altered our view on the complexity of genome organization and gene functions in different kingdoms. PLAZA 3.0 is designed to make comparative genomics data for plants available through a user-friendly web interface. Structural and functional annotation, gene families, protein domains, phylogenetic trees and detailed information about genome organization can easily be queried and visualized. Compared with the first version released in 2009, which featured nine organisms, the number of integrated genomes is more than four times higher, and now covers 37 plant species. The new species provide a wider phylogenetic range as well as a more in-depth sampling of specific clades, and genomes of additional crop species are present. The functional annotation has been expanded and now comprises data from Gene Ontology, MapMan, UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, PlnTFDB and PlantTFDB. Furthermore, we improved the algorithms to transfer functional annotation from well-characterized plant genomes to other species. The additional data and new features make PLAZA 3.0 (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/plaza/) a versatile and comprehensible resource for users wanting to explore genome information to study different aspects of plant biology, both in model and non-model organisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available