4.8 Article

Diverse cell stresses induce unique patterns of tRNA up- and down-regulation: tRNA-seq for quantifying changes in tRNA copy number

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku945

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [ES017010, ES002109]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1308839]
  3. National Research Foundation of Singapore under its Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Chemistry [1308839] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emerging evidence points to roles for tRNA modifications and tRNA abundance in cellular stress responses. While isolated instances of stress-induced tRNA degradation have been reported, we sought to assess the effects of stress on tRNA levels at a systems level. To this end, we developed a next-generation sequencing method that exploits the paucity of ribonucleoside modifications at the 3 '-end of tRNAs to quantify changes in all cellular tRNA molecules. Application of this tRNA-seq method to Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified all 76 expressed unique tRNA species out of 295 coded in the yeast genome, including all isoacceptor variants, with highly precise relative (fold-change) quantification of tRNAs. In studies of stress-induced changes in tRNA levels, we found that oxidation (H2O2) and alkylation (methylmethane sulfonate, MMS) stresses induced nearly identical patterns of up-and down-regulation for 58 tRNAs. However, 18 tRNAs showed opposing changes for the stresses, which parallels our observation of signature reprogramming of tRNA modifications caused by H2O2 and MMS. Further, stress-induced degradation was limited to only a small proportion of a few tRNA species. With tRNA-seq applicable to any organism, these results suggest that translational control of stress response involves a contribution from tRNA abundance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available