4.8 Article

Selective microRNA uridylation by Zcchc6 (TUT7) and Zcchc11 (TUT4)

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 18, Pages 11777-11791

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku805

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [R01GM086386]
  2. American Cancer Society [121635-RSG-11-175-01-RMC]
  3. National Science Foundation pre-doctoral fellowship
  4. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation fellowship [DRSG-7-13]
  5. National Cancer Institute [R01CA163647]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent small RNA sequencing data has uncovered 3' end modification of mature microRNAs (miRNAs). This non-templated nucleotide addition can impact miRNA gene regulatory networks through the control of miRNA stability or by interfering with the repression of target mRNAs. The miRNA modifying enzymes responsible for this regulation remain largely uncharacterized. Here we describe the ability for two related terminal uridyl transferases (TUTases), Zcchc6 (TUT7) and Zcchc11 (TUT4), to 3' mono-uridylate a specific subset of miRNAs involved in cell differentiation and Homeobox (Hox) gene control. Zcchc6/11 selectively uridylates these miRNAs in vitro, and we biochemically define a bipartite sequence motif that is necessary and sufficient to confer Zcchc6/11 catalyzed uridylation. Depletion of these TUTases in cultured cells causes the selective loss of 3' mono-uridylation of many of the same miRNAs. Upon TUTase-dependent loss of uridylation, we observe a concomitant increase in non-templated 3' mono-adenylation. Furthermore, TUTase inhibition in Zebrafish embryos causes developmental defects and aberrant Hox expression. Our results uncover the molecular basis for selective miRNA mono-uridylation by Zcchc6/11, highlight the precise control of different 3' miRNA modifications in cells and have implications for miRNA and Hox gene regulation during development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available