4.8 Article

Global absolute quantification reveals tight regulation of protein expression in single Xenopus eggs

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 15, Pages 9880-9891

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku661

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [NWO] [863.12.002]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [NWO-VIDI] [864.09.003]
  3. European Union [DevCom, a Marie Curie Initial Training Networks action] [607142]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01HD054356]
  5. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO, Incentive Fund Open Access Publications)
  6. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD069344] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While recent developments in genomic sequencing technology have enabled comprehensive transcriptome analyses of single cells, single cell proteomics has thus far been restricted to targeted studies. Here, we perform global absolute protein quantification of fertilized Xenopus laevis eggs using mass spectrometry-based proteomics, quantifying over 5800 proteins in the largest single cell proteome characterized to date. Absolute protein amounts in single eggs are highly consistent, thus indicating a tight regulation of global protein abundance. Protein copy numbers in single eggs range from tens of thousands to ten trillion copies per cell. Comparison between the single-cell proteome and transcriptome reveal poor expression correlation. Finally, we identify 439 proteins that significantly change in abundance during early embryogenesis. Downregulated proteins include ribosomal proteins and upregulated proteins include basal transcription factors, among others. Many of these proteins do not show regulation at the transcript level. Altogether, our data reveal that the transcriptome is a poor indicator of the proteome and that protein levels are tightly controlled in X. laevis eggs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available