4.8 Article

Alternative splicing at GYNNGY 5′ splice sites: more noise, less regulation

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 22, Pages 13969-13980

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1253

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB510100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81030015, 31471224, 31371499]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous eukaryotic genes are alternatively spliced. Recently, deep transcriptome sequencing has skyrocketed proportion of alternatively spliced genes; over 95% human multi-exon genes are alternatively spliced. One fundamental question is: are all these alternative splicing (AS) events functional? To look into this issue, we studied the most common form of alternative 5 ' splice sites--GYNNGYs (Y = C/T), where both GYs can function as splice sites. Global analyses suggest that splicing noise (due to stochasticity of splicing process) can cause AS at GYNNGYs, evidenced by higher AS frequency in non-coding than in coding regions, in non-conserved than in conserved genes and in lowly expressed than in highly expressed genes. However, similar to 20% AS GYNNGYs in humans and similar to 3% in mice exhibit tissue-dependent regulation. Consistent with being functional, regulated GYNNGYs are more conserved than unregulated ones. And regulated GYNNGYs have distinctive sequence features which may confer regulation. Particularly, each regulated GYNNGY comprises two splice sites more resembling each other than unregulated GYNNGYs, and has more conserved downstream flanking intron. Intriguingly, most regulated GYNNGYs may tune gene expression through coupling with nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, rather than encode different proteins. In summary, AS at GYNNGY 5 ' splice sites is primarily splicing noise, and secondarily a way of regulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available