4.8 Article

Snapshots of pre-rRNA structural flexibility reveal eukaryotic 40S assembly dynamics at nucleotide resolution

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 19, Pages 12138-12154

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku815

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ERASMUS student fellowships
  2. Wellcome Trust PhD fellowship [096997]
  3. Medical Research Council Career Development Grant [G1000520]
  4. Wellcome Trust Research and Career Development Grant [091549]
  5. Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology core grant [092076]
  6. Wellcome Trust
  7. MRC [G1000520] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G1000520] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ribosome assembly in eukaryotes involves the activity of hundreds of assembly factors that direct the hierarchical assembly of ribosomal proteins and numerous ribosomal RNA folding steps. However, detailed insights into the function of assembly factors and ribosomal RNA folding events are lacking. To address this, we have developed ChemModSeq, a method that combines structure probing, high-throughput sequencing and statistical modeling, to quantitatively measure RNA structural rearrangements during the assembly of macromolecular complexes. By applying ChemModSeq to purified 40S assembly intermediates we obtained nucleotide-resolution maps of ribosomal RNA flexibility revealing structurally distinct assembly intermediates and mechanistic insights into assembly dynamics not readily observed in cryo-electron microscopy reconstructions. We show that RNA restructuring events coincide with the release of assembly factors and predict that completion of the head domain is required before the Rio1 kinase enters the assembly pathway. Collectively, our results suggest that 40S assembly factors regulate the timely incorporation of ribosomal proteins by delaying specific folding steps in the 3'-major domain of the 20S pre-ribosomal RNA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available